Skip to content

Free tools

Expected value calculator

Compare your chance with the price: expected profit per bet, edge and the break-even chance.

  • No sign-up
  • Runs in your browser
  • Same math as Unitley

Expected value

Runs in your browser

Your own estimate of how often the bet wins.

Read as American +100 · decimal 2.00

Expected profit

+$10

+10.0% of the stake, on average over many bets like this one. Any one bet wins $100 or loses $100.

EV per $1 stakedChance × decimal − 1: 0.55 × 2 − 1.
+10.0%
Your edgeYour chance minus the chance the price implies.
+5.0 pts
Break-even chanceWhat the bet has to win to pay its way at this price: 1 ÷ decimal.
50.00%
If it wins
+$100
If it loses
−$100
The answer is only as good as your chance. If 55.0% is too high, so is the expected profit, and a positive number still loses plenty of single bets.

Expected profit +$10, +10.0% of the stake.

How it works

Expected value is what a bet makes on average, over many bets like it, if your chance is right. A bet at a decimal price returns that price for each $1 staked as often as it wins, and nothing the rest of the time. So on average it returns your chance × the price; take away the $1 staked and that is the EV per $1.

The edge answers a different question: how far your chance is above the chance the price implies, in percentage points. The break-even chance is the line between the two. Below it the bet loses money on average, however good it looks.

The formula

Formula

EV per $1 = chance × decimal − 1

Expected profit = stake × EV per $1

Edge = chance − 1 ÷ decimal

Break-even chance = 1 ÷ decimal

EV per $1 = edge × decimalThe same thing written another way.

A worked NFL example

You give an NFL underdog at +130 a 46% chance to win, and stake $100.

46% at +130
Decimal price: 1 + 130 ÷ 100
2.30
Break-even chance: 1 ÷ 2.30
43.48%
Your edge: 46% − 43.48%
+2.52 pts
EV per $1: 0.46 × 2.30 − 1
+5.8%
Expected profit on $100
+$5.80

Over many bets like this one, that is about $5.80 per $100. Any single bet wins $130 or loses $100, and at 46% it loses more often than it wins.

Common mistakes

  • Treating a positive EV as a likely win. The bet above still loses 54 times in 100. EV is an average over many bets, not a forecast for one.
  • Using the market’s chance as your own. Put a no-vig chance in and the EV comes out negative: at −110 both ways, a fair 50% gives −4.5%, the cost of the margin. Value needs a chance of your own that the market doesn’t share.
  • Overstating your chance. EV moves fast with it. At +130, 44% instead of 46% cuts the EV from +5.8% to +1.2%, and 42% makes it −3.4%.
  • Mixing up edge and EV. The edge here is +2.5 pts; the EV is +5.8%. Since EV is the edge × the price, the same edge is worth more at a longer price.

In Unitley

Unitley shows the no-vig price and expected value for the NFL games it covers, and its analyst works through the same math and shows its working. About the analyst.

The same math, across the slate.

Unitley runs this math on the NFL games it covers, with prices from the books it tracks and stakes sized to your own bankroll: in your own Claude, in another AI agent or in the web app on your own key. Analysis, never a guarantee.